Are You Supposed To Read The Hobbit First

Are You Supposed to Read The Hobbit First? A Look at Reading Order and Tolkien's Legendarium

So, you're diving into the world of J.R.R. Tolkien, a realm of hobbits, elves, dwarves, and epic quests. But a crucial question arises before embarking on this literary journey: should you read The Hobbit before The Lord of the Rings? The short answer is… it depends. This article will explore the pros and cons of both reading orders, helping you decide which approach best suits your reading preferences and understanding of Tolkien's rich mythology.

The Traditional Approach: The Hobbit Then The Lord of the Rings

This is the chronological order of publication, and for many, it feels like the natural progression. The Hobbit, published in 1937, introduces readers to the whimsical world of Middle-earth and the hobbit Bilbo Baggins. It's a standalone adventure that's generally considered more accessible and quicker to read than The Lord of the Rings.

• Pros:

  • Easier Onboarding: The Hobbit provides a gentler introduction to Tolkien's style and the world of Middle-earth. The simpler narrative and quicker pace make it an easier entry point for new readers.
  • Character Development: Reading The Hobbit first allows you to see Bilbo's development as a character, setting the stage for his later importance in The Lord of the Rings.
  • Familiar Faces: Encountering familiar characters like Gandalf and Gollum in The Hobbit adds another layer of depth and anticipation when you move on to the larger saga.

• Cons:

  • Some Inconsistencies: There are some inconsistencies between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, particularly in the portrayal of certain characters and the overall tone. This can be jarring for some readers.
  • Narrative Differences: The writing style of The Hobbit is noticeably different from The Lord of the Rings. This shift in style might be disruptive for some readers.

The Alternative Approach: The Lord of the Rings First?

While less common, starting with The Lord of the Rings offers a unique perspective. This approach prioritizes the overarching narrative and delves directly into the more complex world Tolkien created.

• Pros:

  • Grander Scale: Immersing yourself in the epic scope of The Lord of the Rings immediately offers a more profound understanding of the larger narrative and the significance of the events in Middle-earth.
  • Deeper Context: The Lord of the Rings provides richer context for understanding the history and complexities of Middle-earth, which can enrich your subsequent reading of The Hobbit.
  • Avoiding Inconsistencies: Reading The Lord of the Rings first may lessen the impact of perceived inconsistencies, as you'll have a more complete picture of Tolkien's world before encountering The Hobbit.

• Cons:

  • Steeper Learning Curve: The Lord of the Rings is significantly longer and more complex than The Hobbit, presenting a steeper learning curve for new readers.
  • Reduced Impact of Bilbo's Journey: Starting with The Lord of the Rings might diminish the impact of Bilbo's journey in The Hobbit as it's presented as a prelude to a much larger story.

The Bottom Line: It's Your Journey

Ultimately, the "correct" reading order is a matter of personal preference. There's no universally accepted answer. Consider your reading style, your tolerance for complexity, and what you prioritize in a reading experience. Whether you choose The Hobbit first or The Lord of the Rings, you're in for a rewarding journey through Tolkien's incredible world. Enjoy the adventure!