Why Did Dr Tenma Save Johan Again

Why Did Dr. Tenma Save Johan Again? Exploring the Complexities of Monster's Morality

Dr. Kenzo Tenma's repeated saving of Johan Liebert in Monster is a central point of contention and intrigue for many viewers. It's not a simple act of compassion, but a complex interplay of guilt, obsession, and a twisted sense of responsibility that fuels Tenma's actions throughout the series. This article delves into the multifaceted reasons behind Tenma's seemingly contradictory behavior, exploring the psychological and thematic underpinnings of his choices.

The Weight of Guilt and the Illusion of Control:

Tenma's initial decision to save Johan's life as a child stems from his unwavering belief in the sanctity of life. However, the devastating consequences that follow – the escalating series of murders and manipulations orchestrated by Johan – weigh heavily on Tenma's conscience. He's haunted by the belief that he is responsible for Johan's monstrous actions, a burden of guilt that drives much of his later behavior. This isn't simply regret; it's a deep-seated conviction that he could have prevented the horrors unfolding before him. He sees saving Johan, in a perverse way, as an attempt to atone for his perceived failure and regain a sense of control over the situation. He believes that by monitoring Johan, even indirectly, he can somehow mitigate the damage.

The Fascination with a 'Monster':

Beyond guilt, there's an element of morbid fascination at play. Johan, as a character, is compelling and terrifying. His intelligence, manipulative skills, and chilling charisma represent a dark mirror reflecting Tenma's own struggle with morality and the nature of good versus evil. Tenma's repeated attempts to 'understand' Johan, even to 'fix' him, suggests a preoccupation bordering on obsession. He's drawn to the mystery of Johan's psyche, a desire to comprehend the origins of such profound evil. This fascination, however unhealthy, becomes a crucial element influencing his actions.

A Twisted Sense of Responsibility:

Tenma's actions are driven by a profoundly twisted sense of responsibility. He doesn't simply feel guilty; he feels a responsibility to control the situation, even if it means extending Johan's life. He views himself as the only one capable of preventing further catastrophe, even though his interventions often have the opposite effect. This responsibility, though misguided, fuels his persistence in pursuing Johan. He believes that he has a unique understanding of Johan, making him uniquely positioned to deal with him, however disastrous his approaches may be.

The Crumbling Foundation of his Moral Compass:

Tenma’s choices also reflect the progressive erosion of his own moral compass. Initially guided by a strong sense of ethics, his encounters with Johan and the resulting chaos gradually challenge and ultimately fracture his ideals. The line between right and wrong becomes increasingly blurred, influencing his decisions and leading him down a path where saving Johan becomes a warped form of justice, or even self-preservation. He’s so invested in "fixing" this monster that he overlooks the ethical implications of his continued involvement.

Conclusion:

Dr. Tenma's repeated saving of Johan is not a simple act of benevolence but a complex tapestry woven from guilt, obsession, a twisted sense of responsibility, and a progressively eroding moral compass. It's a testament to the enduring power of the narrative's exploration of human nature and the devastating consequences of even well-intentioned actions. His actions, while questionable, underscore the tragic and compelling nature of his character and the central theme of the Monster story itself.